Showing posts with label brightest. Show all posts
Showing posts with label brightest. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 7, 2011

Brightest graduates 'to receive £20k bursaries to teach'

Graduates with first-class honours degrees will be able to claim the most lucrative financial incentives to teach subjects seen as vital to pupils’ future career prospects, such as maths, physics, chemistry, biology and foreign languages.

Students awarded a 2:1 or 2:2 at university will be eligible for smaller bursaries and ministers will refuse to fund teacher training courses for students with third-class degrees.

The plans will be outlined on Tuesday by Michael Gove, the Education Secretary, as part of a sweeping reform of the teacher training system in England.

Under the strategy, student teachers will be expected to display better standards of English and maths before being allowed to qualify – scrapping a current rule that gives trainees unlimited attempts to pass basic tests in the three-Rs.

The Government will also attempt to encourage former Army Forces personnel into the classroom with the establishment of a new “Troops to Teachers” programme.

In a further move, teacher training courses will be reformed to put more focus on behaviour management and reading.

And ministers will also build on plans to train more students directly in schools – instead of university-based postgraduate programmes.

The reforms are designed to raise the profile of the teaching profession amid fears that English state schools are falling behind those in other developed nations.

It comes just days after Sir Michael Wilshaw, the incoming head of Ofsted, warned that the watchdog needed to do more to crack down on coasting teachers.

He said extra effort was needed to identify “the teacher… who year in, year out just comes up to the mark, but only just, and does the bare minimum".

Mr Gove said: "If we want to have an education system that ranks with the best in the world, then we need to attract the best people to train to teach, and we need to give them outstanding training.

"We have some excellent teachers in this country, but many who could make a huge difference in the lives of children choose other professions.”

The reforms being announced on Tuesday are expected to be introduced for new trainee teachers starting in September 2012.

It will place a significant emphasis on improving standards in traditional subjects that are seen as key to progression to top universities and in heavy demand among employers.

Bursaries of £20,000 will be available for students with a first-class degree to teach maths, sciences and foreign languages. Lesser awards – believed to be around £9,000 – will be awarded to top students teaching other secondary subjects and to work in primary schools.

Students with a 2:1 degree are set to get £15,000 to teach the most important subjects, while those with 2:2s could receive £11,000.

In addition, the Government will fund around 100 scholarships through the Institute of Physics – worth £20,000 – for exceptional physics graduates to train.

Ministers will also underline their determination to focus on the best students by refusing to fund courses for those who fail to gain at least a 2:2 - potentially preventing thousands of graduates from entering the profession.

Sunday, November 20, 2011

The brightest family in Britain?

At Oxford there is no single graduation ceremony at the end of a degree as is customary in most universities. Instead, graduates make their own arrangements to attend one of several such events which are held throughout the year.

When Mark finished his exams 25 years ago, he went travelling and then got a job and never got round to collecting his degree. Helen did the same and so it became a family tradition not to graduate, the understanding being that if, by some fluke, they all got to Oxford, they could graduate together.

And so now, after just such a fluke and some negotiation, New College has agreed to host this historic occasion. Their parents – Stephen, a judge who read jurisprudence at Wadham, and Frances, who worked for the historian Christopher Hibbert – will be present, along with 19 of their grandchildren, to watch their children graduate en masse.

They can congratulate themselves that each of their offspring has forged his or her own career path: Mark lives in Paris and is European head of marketing for an American technology firm; Charles runs a sustainability consultancy; Elizabeth is pursuing a spiritual life at the Croatian pilgrimage site of Medjugorje, where the Virgin Mary is said to appear daily; and Edward runs an investment consultancy.

“Our parents never placed us under any pressure to conform,” says Charles. “Personally, I think university isn’t the be-all and end-all. What really matters is emotional intelligence rather than IQ.”

Such magnanimity puts paid to what is without doubt the bitterest academic schism – no, not between Darwinists and Creationists, but between Oxbridge alumni and everyone else, who hates them on principle. The principle being that the Dreaming Spires invariably churn out over-privileged, Master of the Universe types.

This is, of course, utter tosh. Oxford graduates are no more likely to Lord Snooty it over us than anyone else. Apart from David Cameron (Brasenose). And George Osborne (Magdalen). Oh, and William Hague (Magdalen). And Theresa May (St Hugh’s). And Michael Gove (Lady Margaret Hall). There’s more, but not in a good way, so let us turn back to the O’Malleys, who are an altogether more convivial and economically productive bunch. The boys attended the Catholic equivalent of Eton, Ampleforth, as did their father and their grandfathers. The girls went to St Paul’s Girls’ School.

Their parents employed no early hothousing methods to propel them to a top university. No classical music was piped into the womb (and certainly not K.626: as any fule kno it is Mozart’s Requiem Mass in D Minor), there was no extra-curricular Kumon after primary school, no Sunday afternoon tutors or Sixth Form College boot camps. But, oddly, ladybirds (collective term, the unforgettably delightful “a loveliness”) did play a part.

“My mother did show us Ladybird flashcards when we were little,” says Helen. “Maybe that had an effect?”

“And there was a poster of the Kings and Queens of England on the back of the loo door,” says Thomas. “I’m appalled to see five-year-olds who live near us being given homework – at the parents’ request. Our parents never showed any interest, although when I was about eight, I pleaded with my mother for help with my fractions and she got it wrong, so I never asked her again.”

Other than being encouraged to read the many history books in the house – one ancestor on their father’s side was Admiral Augustus Keppel whose flagship was HMS Victory before Nelson – there was no question of a helicopter parent hovering above them monitoring their activities. It was simply understood that school was for studying and home was for playing. “There was an old-fashioned emphasis on fresh air and being in the garden for hours at a time,” says Charles, who doesn’t own a television set and whose children attend a Rudolf Steiner School. “We ate together as a family and talked, but it wasn’t about politics or history. I recall a lot of my childhood being spent building with Lego and gung-ho games with toy guns.”

Pretend weaponry may no longer be considered politically correct, but gung-ho, inventive children make for gung-ho, inventive adults, something that he says has been lost. “Employers say that young people lack initiative and the ability to problem-solve – that’s because they spend their childhoods glued to screens, playing computer games that may be exciting, but don’t enhance their individual creativity the way building a den does.”

So here we have it; living proof of the benefits of education for education’s sake. They all agree that Oxford fosters confidence, analytical skills and articulacy, even if Helen dryly observes “that’s why politicians can drone on so extensively on subjects about which they know nothing.”

So it’s all the more appalling then, to learn how disillusioned some of the O’Malleys have become with academe. “University is now so expensive that none of us would have made it to Oxford,” says Thomas. “Our school fees were paid by my parents selling off family antiques, and by the end of A-levels there were none left.”

Charles concurs: going to university shouldn’t be equated with a trip to the jobcentre. “My concern is that young people will be saddled with such debts that they will base their choice of subject solely on financial grounds and what career they are guaranteed at the end of it.”

Helen, whose eldest child, aged 20, has cerebral palsy, says bringing up a child with special needs has given her an insight into the way children are shoehorned into a one-size-fits-all educational system. She isn’t even sure she wants her children to go to university.

“It’s nice to finally pick up my degree, if only to show my children that Mummy used to have a brain, but now that you get a degree in almost anything, the achievement has been devalued. I’d be quite happy if my children chose apprenticeships instead.”

But this afternoon all such gloom will be cast aside for the O’Malleys, whose winning Oxford streak puts them ahead of journalist and author Stanley Johnson, whose five children, including Boris, mayor of London, went there and the disgraced newspaper publisher Robert Maxwell. Six of his nine children graduated from Oxford, although not at the same ceremony.

“The most important thing about today is that it has given us an opportunity to get together as a family,” says Helen. “Having lunch, catching up, laughing and enjoying each other’s company. Those are the things that really matter in life.”